Freedom of speech: what you can say, and what to do if police call
What Article 19(1)(a) protects, the eight grounds for limits, which BNS sections are used against posts, and your exact rights if an FIR or notice follows.
In short
- Art 19(1)(a) protects your speech, writing, art and online posts, including criticism of the government. Limits are allowed only on the eight grounds in Art 19(2), and only if "reasonable".
- Criticism, satire and unpopular opinion are protected. Incitement to violence, promoting enmity between groups, threats and knowingly false statements that ruin a real person's reputation are not.
- If police contact you about a post: do not delete it, ask for the FIR or notice in writing, and call a lawyer or 15100 before you answer questions.
- For most speech offences police should issue a notice under Sec 35 BNSS rather than arrest, and the Supreme Court has said a preliminary inquiry should normally come before an FIR.
Every time you post an opinion, sign a petition, write to an editor or complain about a bad road, you are using one of your most important rights. That freedom has limits, and knowing where the line lies lets you speak with confidence and recognise when someone is trying to silence you without legal basis.
What the Constitution protects
Art 19(1)(a) gives every citizen the right to freedom of speech and expression. Courts read it widely: spoken and written words, art, films, cartoons, dress, silence, and speech on the internet. It includes the right to receive information, which is why press freedom and the right to information flow from it.
In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, which allowed arrests for "offensive" or "annoying" online messages. The Court drew a line between discussion and advocacy, which are protected, and incitement, which is not. In Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) it held that speech and trade through the internet are protected under Article 19, and that internet shutdowns must be necessary, proportionate and open to review.
The limits the law allows
Art 19(2) lets the State make laws imposing "reasonable restrictions" on these grounds only: sovereignty and integrity of India; security of the State; friendly relations with foreign States; public order; decency or morality; contempt of court; defamation; and incitement to an offence. In Kaushal Kishor v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) a Constitution Bench held that no ground beyond these can be added. "Reasonable" means the restriction must go no further than needed; a law cannot ban a whole subject because some people dislike it.
Where speech becomes a crime
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) gives effect to these limits. The sections most often cited against posts and speeches are:
- Sec 196 BNS (earlier Sec 153A IPC): promoting enmity between groups on grounds of religion, race, caste, language and the like.
- Sec 197 BNS (earlier Sec 153B IPC): imputations that a group cannot be loyal to India, or statements prejudicial to national integration.
- Sec 299 BNS (earlier Sec 295A IPC): deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings.
- Sec 302 BNS (earlier Sec 298 IPC): words uttered with deliberate intent to wound religious feelings.
- Sec 353 BNS (earlier Sec 505 IPC): statements, rumours or false information likely to cause public mischief, fear or enmity.
- Sec 356 BNS (earlier Secs 499–500 IPC): defamation, meaning a false imputation that harms a real person's reputation. Truth for the public good, fair comment and opinion in good faith are defences.
- Sec 152 BNS: acts endangering the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India (see our separate article on sedition).
Courts insist these sections be read narrowly. In Imran Pratapgarhi v. State of Gujarat (2025) the Supreme Court quashed an FIR over a poem and held that the effect of words must be judged by the standard of a reasonable, strong-minded person, not of someone who feels threatened by every opposing view. It also held that for speech offences punishable with three to seven years, the police should normally use the preliminary inquiry allowed by Sec 173(3) BNSS (up to 14 days, with a senior officer's permission) before registering an FIR.
Step by step: if police contact you about a post
- Do not delete anything. Your full post, in context, is usually your best defence. Take dated screenshots of it and of any threats you receive.
- Ask for paper. Politely ask for a copy of the FIR and the sections invoked. You are entitled to a free copy of the FIR. If you get a phone call asking you to "come to the station", ask for a written notice.
- Know the notice rule. For offences punishable with up to seven years, police should normally serve a notice to appear under Sec 35 BNSS (earlier Sec 41A CrPC) rather than arrest you, as the Supreme Court held in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014). Comply with the notice, with a lawyer.
- Call a lawyer before you talk. You have the right to remain silent on questions that could incriminate you (Art 20(3)) and to consult an advocate. Call 15100 for free legal aid.
- If arrested, you must be told the grounds, may inform a relative or friend, may meet your lawyer during questioning, and must be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours.
- Go to the High Court if the case is baseless. An advocate can seek anticipatory bail and can ask the High Court to quash an FIR that does not disclose an offence, as courts regularly do in speech cases.
Nitin, a college student, posted a sarcastic video mocking the state government's handling of floods. Three days later a constable phoned him to "come and explain". Nitin did not delete the video. He saved a copy with the upload date, called the NALSA helpline, and was connected to a panel advocate. The advocate wrote to the station asking for any FIR and the sections. The reply showed an FIR under Sec 353 BNS. The advocate replied that the video contained criticism, not a false statement likely to cause public mischief, cited Shreya Singhal and Imran Pratapgarhi, and filed a quashing petition. The High Court stayed coercive action at the first hearing.
Keep these ready
- Dated screenshots or a downloaded copy of the full post, including replies and context
- Screenshots of any threats, abuse or notices you receive, with the sender's handle and URL
- Copy of the FIR or Sec 35 BNSS notice, if any
- Your identity proof and the contact number of an advocate or the DLSA
- Evidence that a statement is true, or is clearly labelled opinion or satire
Forwarding is also speaking. Sharing a doctored video or a false rumour about a community can attract Sec 196 or 353 BNS even if you did not create it, and you cannot defend defamation by saying "I only forwarded it". Check before you share.
Where to go
- Emergency or threats of violence: 112; women can call 181.
- Online abuse, threats or impersonation: report on the platform, then at cybercrime.gov.in or helpline 1930.
- If you are the one being investigated: the Station House Officer for the FIR copy; the Superintendent of Police if the station will not give it.
- Free legal aid: 15100, your District Legal Services Authority, nalsa.gov.in.
- Courts: the Sessions Court for anticipatory bail; the High Court to quash a baseless FIR (Art 226 or Sec 528 BNSS); the Supreme Court under Art 32.
Common questions
Can I be arrested for criticising the government or a minister on social media?
Criticism, however harsh, is protected by Article 19(1)(a), and the Supreme Court has repeatedly quashed FIRs over such posts. Arrest is lawful only if your words fall within an actual offence, such as incitement to violence or promoting enmity between groups. For most speech offences, police should first issue a notice under Sec 35 BNSS rather than arrest.
Is defamation a crime in India?
Yes. Defamation is both a civil wrong (you can be sued for damages) and a criminal offence under Sec 356 BNS, punishable with up to two years' imprisonment, a fine, or both. Truth published for the public good, fair comment on public conduct, and opinion expressed in good faith are defences. The Supreme Court upheld criminal defamation in Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India (2016).
Is hate speech defined in Indian law?
There is no single offence called "hate speech". Several BNS sections cover it, chiefly Sec 196 (promoting enmity between groups), Sec 197 (imputations against national integration), Sec 299 (outraging religious feelings) and Sec 353 (statements conducing public mischief). The Supreme Court has directed police to register FIRs in hate speech cases on their own, without waiting for a complaint.
Can the government block my post or account?
Only under a law. Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 allows blocking orders on specified grounds, through a committee process, and the Supreme Court upheld it in Shreya Singhal because it includes safeguards. Blocking orders can be challenged in the High Court. Platforms also remove content under their own rules, which is a separate, private decision.
This article is general information for awareness, not legal advice. For your situation, consult an advocate or call free legal aid at 15100.